Climate Change, Collapse and Social Choice Theory∗
نویسنده
چکیده
The enlightenment was a philosophical project to construct a rational society without the need for a supreme being . It opened the way for the creation of market democracy and rapid economic growth. At the same time economic growth is the underlying cause of climate change, and we have become aware that this may destroy our civilization. The principal underpinning of the enlightenment project is the general equilibrium theorem (GET) of Arrow and Debreu (1954), asserting the existence of a Pareto optimal price equilibrium. Arrow’s work in social choice can be interpreted as an attempt to construct a more general social equilibrium theorem. The current paper surveys recent results in social choice which suggests that chaos rather than equilibrium is generic. We also consider models of belief aggregation similar to Condorcet’s Jury theorem and mention Penn’s Theorem on existence of a belief equilibrium. However, it is suggested that a belief equilibrium with regard to the appropriate response to climate change depends on the creation of a fundamental social principle of "guardianship of our planetary home." It is suggested that this will involve conflict between entrenched economic intrests and ordinary people, as the effects of climate change make themselves felt in many countries. JEL classification: H10
منابع مشابه
The Enlightenment and Social Choice Theory∗
The enlightenment was a philosophical project to construct a rational society without the need for a supreme being . It opened the way for the creation of market democracy and rapid economic growth. At the same time economic growth is the underlying cause of climate change, and we have become aware that this may destroy our civilization. The principal underpinning of the enlightenment project i...
متن کامل“Dangerous” Climate Change: Probabilistic Integrated Assessment, Ecosystem Impacts, and Abrupt Climatic Change
One of the most controversial conclusions to emerge from many of the first generation of integrated assessment models (IAMs) of climate policy was the perceived economic optimality of negligible near-term abatement of greenhouse gases. Typically, such studies were conducted using smoothly varying climate change scenarios or impact responses. Abrupt changes observed in the climatic record and do...
متن کاملSocial Inequalities of Climate Change With a Regional and Global Approach
Climate change is a slow and long-term change that is different from other types of crises, and its effects will eventually cause the paralysis of society and the world economy. Considering the last climate change summit in Glasgow and the previous summit, according to the authors of this text, preventing and dealing with climate change in the present era will not be possible except with the co...
متن کاملPii: S1469-3062(01)00038-9
One of the most controversial conclusions to emerge from many of the first generation of integrated assessment models (IAMs) of climate policy was the perceived economic optimality of negligible near-term abatement of greenhouse gases. Typically, such studies were conducted using smoothly varying climate change scenarios or impact responses. Abrupt changes observed in the climatic record and do...
متن کاملThe resilience and adaptive capacity of social-environmental systems in colonial Mexico.
Civilization collapse scenarios highlight what for some are worrying parallels between past case studies and societies under threat from apparently unprecedented global environmental and climate change today. Archive-based studies of socio-economic responses to climate variability in colonial Mexico suggest that the complex interactions between environment and society influence the degree to wh...
متن کامل